Serial

Acta Agriculturae Slovenica
Agriculture (Poľnohospodárstvo)
Annales UMCS, Agricultura
Annales UMCS, Horticultura
Annales UMCS, Medicina Veterinaria
Annales UMCS, Zootechnica
Annals of Animal Science
Bulletin of the Veterinary Institute in Pulawy
Folia Horticulturae
Forest Research Papers
Forestry Studies / Metsanduslikud Uurimused
International Agrophysics
Journal of Agrobiology
Journal of Landscape Ecology
Journal of Plant Protection Research
Lesnícky časopis - Forestry Journal
Plant Breeding and Seed Science
Polish Journal of Food and Nutrition Sciences
Polish Journal of Veterinary Sciences
Proceedings of the Latvia University of Agriculture
Roczniki Gleboznawcze - Soli Science Annual
Scientia Agriculturae Bohemica
Vegetable Crops Research Bulletin

Reviewers

Guidelines for Reviewers


As peer-review journal, we perform the quality control for submitted manuscripts by refereeing process. We are very grateful to our Reviewers for their effort and time spent on evaluating manuscripts for Vegetable Crops Research Bulletin (VCRB).

We ask our Referees to:

  • comment on originality of presented work, how it presents in most recent literature on a topic discussed,
  • evaluate authors' approach to discussed problem,
  • evaluate reliability of obtained results and correctness of withdrawn conclu-sions,
  • comment on  technical aspects of paper,
  • give the final evaluation of paper, inform us whether we should consider it further and what should be done in order to make it publishable.

Specific expectations for Research Papers - manuscripts submitted to VCRB are given in Instructions for Authors.

Review Articles (Survey Papers) - should contain the most significant results of the subject under review. All reviews  should be accurate scientifically, should describe the most relevant and recent contributions, the subject matter should be discussed competently and the choice of citations should be adequate.

Accepted papers will undergo language editing by native English speaker. Incorrect grammar, style or punctuation should not be the reason to reject a paper if its content warrants the publication from the scientific point of view and is readable for the Reviewer.

Please provide your report within specified deadline or inform the Editor if you are not able to do so. You can submit your review either via  email to the Editor. In the specific cases  reports can be returned as a hard copy via mail or fax. Reviewers are kindly requested to deliver reports in 3-4 weeks.

Resources

Review form 

Partners

SpringerDeGruyterMetaPressAriesEbrary

Members

Cross RefSTMAlpsp