Evaluation sheet
-
Please grade the paper according to the attached scale by placing (X) in the appropriate spot:
-
1- unsatisfactory
-
2- poor
-
3 – satisfactory
-
4 – good
-
5 – very good
Comments for the author and the editorial board.
On a separate sheet of paper please give specific comments regarding the manuscript, which are in accordance with the evaluation sheet.
|
Clearness of the research problem (hypothesis)
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
|
Originality of the research
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selection of research material
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Description of research methods (statistics)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Presentation of results (tables and figures)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quality of discussion
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selection and use of references
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General value of the manuscript
|
|
|
|
|
|
Final recommendation of the reviewer:
Manuscript accepted for print
Manuscript accepted for print following minor corrections
Return to reviewer after suggested corrections
Manuscript rejected
The editorial board would like to thank the reviewer for his extended effort in evaluating the submitted manuscript to the JHK.
General and specific comments
