Serial

Acrocephalus
Acta Biologica Cracoviensia series Botanica
Acta Botanica Croatica
Acta Parasitologica
Advances in Cell Biology
Animal Migration
Annales UMCS, Biologia
Anthropological Review
Archives of Environmental Protection
Archives of Polish Fisheries
Biodiversity: Research and Conservation
Biologia
Biological Letters
Biologija
Biotechnology & Biotechnological Equipment
Botanica Lithuanica
Casopis slezskeho zemskeho muzea (A)
Cellular & Molecular Biology Letters
Central European Journal of Biology
Current Topics in Biophysics
DNA Barcodes
Ecological Genomics
Epigenetics in Cancer
Folia Biologica et Oecologica
Folia Malacologica
Hacquetia
Helminthologia
Interactome
Invertebrate Immunity
Kinome
Limnological Papers
Microbial Community
Natural Products Against Cancer
Non-Genetic Inheritance
Ocean Acidification
Oceanological and Hydrobiological Studies
Plant MicroRNA
Polish Journal of Entomology
Polish Polar Research
Polymicrobial Infections
Proceedings of the Latvian Academy of Sciences. Section B: Natural, Exact and Applied Sciences
Protist Genomics
Ring
Riparian Ecology and Conservation
Slovak Raptor Journal
Slovenian Journal of Public Health
Sommerfeltia
Synthetic Genomics
Systems Microbiology
Systems Pharmacology
Transcriptome Profiling
Travaux du Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle “Grigore Antipa”
Tumor Microenvironment and Therapy
Vestnik Zoologii
Zoologica Poloniae

Reviewers Guide

Your contribution

We greatly appreciate the time and effort given by reviewers in evaluating papers for publication in our journal. Thanks to your contribution, Cellular & Molecular Biology Letters authors receive fast, fair and comprehensive review.

Our standards

  • our reviewers are kindly requested to deliver reports in 3-4 weeks
  • communications are published in 6 weeks from receipt, research and review papers in 8-9 weeks, unless they have needed major revision by authors
  • research articles and communications are reviewed by a minimum of two reviewers, review papers by at least three
  • we pay special attention to receive unbiased, fair opinions; special policies govern allocation of reviewers to articles
  • whenever submissions qualifies for publication but needs revision, reviewers are asked to give comprehensive opinion on necessary improvements

Peer review guidelines

Please read these guidelines carefully before you report on any article.


Tools

We encourage our reviewers to use our online submission system Editool. You can look at this site. To log into the system you need to use the data sent to you by Editor via email. The Editool manual for referees is available on the Editool webpage. If using the online system is not convenient for you, please contact the Editor by email.


Welcome

If you wish to support us as a reviewer, please contact the Managing Editor at cmbl@cmbl.org.pl.

Partners

SpringerDeGruyterMetaPressAriesEbrary

Members

Cross RefSTMAlpsp