Serial

Suggestions for the reviewers 

When reviewing a manuscript please, remember it is anonymous and confidential. Your suggestions and opinions meant for the editor only ought to be separated from those made available to the author. Whatever your opinion, the final decision is with the editor and the justification will be available. Yet, even in case of rejecting the manuscript, the reviewer is requested to make constructive comments so as to help the author improving the paper. 

Please, be as kind as to pay special attention to the points listed in the review sheet and, in addition, whether Biomedical Human Kinetics is the right one to publish the manuscript and whether the manuscript is easy to read and understand. This section, which may include other comments, may be reserved for editorial use only. 
Moreover, when preparing your numbered comments addressed to the author, cover the following issues: 

1. The abstract and the key words – are they clear enough and in accordance with the contents of the paper?
2. The objective of the study – is it well defined and formulated?
3. Material and Methods – are the participants of the study and the methods used adequately de-scribed?
4. The results – do they seem credible and consistent with the title and objective?
5. Figures and tables – are they well designed and relevant? This point requires special care.
6. The conclusions – do they follow from the presented results? Are not the findings, i.e. facts, presented as conclusions?
7. Are the references relevant with respect to the text? Any obvious references not cited?